Caleb Ross had not practiced law in our state for nearly three years.<\/p>\n
Maya located him through a professional directory and contacted him the following morning.<\/p>\n
He returned her call that afternoon.<\/p>\n
Because Lorraine had been his client, he could not simply tell us everything.<\/p>\n
Attorney-client privilege still mattered.<\/p>\n
Even when the advice seemed connected to the larger mess.<\/p>\n
But he could confirm certain public or nonprivileged facts.<\/p>\n
He had represented Lorraine.<\/p>\n
The engagement began almost four years earlier.<\/p>\n
Before Frank died.<\/p>\n
Before the trust objection.<\/p>\n
Before any discussion we knew about involving Daniel\u2019s legal rights.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did she hire him for?\u201d Travis asked.<\/p>\n
Maya chose her words carefully.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe cannot disclose substance without Lorraine\u2019s waiver.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen what can he say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat the matter concerned potential grandparent visitation and family access.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cAccess to who?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe would not specify.\u201d<\/p>\n
He did not need to.<\/p>\n
At that time, Lorraine had established relationships with all of her biological grandchildren.<\/p>\n
Only one child created a legal ambiguity.<\/p>\n
Zia.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy would she need grandparent rights if she refused to call Zia her granddaughter?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
Travis looked at me.<\/p>\n
The contradiction was almost too perfect.<\/p>\n
Emotionally, Lorraine denied the title.<\/p>\n
Legally, she had explored whether it could give her rights.<\/p>\n
\u201cCan Lorraine waive privilege?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWill she?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe can ask.\u201d<\/p>\n
Travis did not want to call directly.<\/p>\n
So Maya communicated with Lorraine\u2019s attorney.<\/p>\n
The request was simple.<\/p>\n
If Lorraine wanted the financial issues disentangled from Grant\u2019s conduct, allowing her former attorney to confirm the limited purpose and chronology of his engagement could help.<\/p>\n
We expected resistance.<\/p>\n
Instead, Lorraine signed a narrow waiver the next day.<\/p>\n
Not complete.<\/p>\n
But enough.<\/p>\n
Caleb agreed to a joint call with both counsel present.<\/p>\n
He appeared on screen from what looked like a small office lined with boxes.<\/p>\n
He was younger than I expected.<\/p>\n
Mid-forties perhaps.<\/p>\n
Careful.<\/p>\n
Professional.<\/p>\n
\u201cI want to be clear,\u201d he began, \u201cI am speaking only within the scope of the waiver.\u201d<\/p>\n
Maya nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe understand.\u201d<\/p>\n
Caleb reviewed the timeline.<\/p>\n
Lorraine contacted him shortly after Travis and I became engaged.<\/p>\n
Not married.<\/p>\n
Engaged.<\/p>\n
That pushed everything back farther.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe was worried about losing contact with her son,\u201d Caleb said.<\/p>\n
Travis\u2019s expression tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy would my marriage cause that?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI can\u2019t characterize her emotional state beyond what the waiver permits.\u201d<\/p>\n
Fair.<\/p>\n
He continued.<\/p>\n
Lorraine wanted to know whether a stepparent relationship could affect grandparent access.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe asked about me?\u201d I said.<\/p>\n
\u201cIndirectly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIn what way?\u201d<\/p>\n
Caleb looked at Lorraine\u2019s attorney on the call.<\/p>\n
The attorney nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cMrs. Bennett believed your future household might reduce her contact with Travis and, by extension, with a child she had begun seeing regularly.\u201d<\/p>\n
Zia.<\/p>\n
Even then.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe was calling herself Zia\u2019s grandparent to a lawyer?\u201d<\/p>\n
Caleb hesitated.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe described the relationship in multiple ways.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course she did.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she ask about legal visitation rights?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she have any?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot likely under the facts then.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause Zia had two legal parents.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel was legally still her father.<\/p>\n
I was her mother.<\/p>\n
Travis was not yet legally a parent.<\/p>\n
Lorraine had no biological or adoptive tie to Zia.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe asked whether that would change if Travis adopted her.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
There it was again.<\/p>\n
Adoption mattered from the beginning.<\/p>\n
Not only because of Frank\u2019s trust.<\/p>\n
Because adoption could create legal standing for Lorraine as a grandparent.<\/p>\n
I frowned.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat should have made her support adoption.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOn that narrow issue, perhaps.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why didn\u2019t she?\u201d<\/p>\n
Caleb\u2019s expression became uncomfortable.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause her concerns were not singular.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does that mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe wanted legal recognition of the relationship when it benefited access.\u201d<\/p>\n
Travis leaned forward.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd biological distinction when it benefited inheritance.\u201d<\/p>\n
Caleb did not confirm the second half.<\/p>\n
But he did not need to.<\/p>\n
Lorraine wanted both positions available.<\/p>\n
Zia was close enough to claim.<\/p>\n
Different enough to exclude.<\/p>\n
A granddaughter for access.<\/p>\n
A stepchild for money.<\/p>\n
That contradiction explained years of behavior better than any single motive.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you advise her to contact Daniel?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
The answer came immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you suggest she encourage him to remain involved?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you meet Grant?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMarlene?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
That separated Caleb from the later scheme.<\/p>\n
He had provided ordinary legal advice.<\/p>\n
Lorraine had taken the information elsewhere.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you tell her?\u201d Travis asked.<\/p>\n
Caleb glanced toward the attorneys.<\/p>\n
Then answered within the waiver.<\/p>\n
\u201cI told her that courts generally prioritize parents\u2019 rights and children\u2019s interests. I told her that preserving a warm, voluntary relationship would be far more valuable than trying to create a legal claim.\u201d<\/p>\n
The irony hurt.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she listen?\u201d<\/p>\n
Caleb\u2019s expression softened.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe thanked me.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was not an answer.<\/p>\n
It was enough.<\/p>\n
Then he added one final detail.<\/p>\n
Lorraine returned for a second consultation approximately nine months later.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat changed?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe asked whether financial support to Daniel could affect anything.\u201d<\/p>\n
My attention sharpened.<\/p>\n
\u201cIn what way?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAgain, I can only go so far.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lorraine had asked whether helping a biological parent remain involved would strengthen or weaken future arguments about family relationships.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you tell her?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat money should never be used to manufacture evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n
The sentence landed heavily.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou used those words?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cVery close.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo she was warned.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Before Grant.<\/p>\n
Before Marlene.<\/p>\n
Before the larger payments.<\/p>\n
Lorraine had already asked a lawyer whether financing Daniel could affect the family landscape.<\/p>\n
And the lawyer told her not to manufacture evidence.<\/p>\n
Travis sat back.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat changes things.\u201d<\/p>\n
It did.<\/p>\n
Lorraine\u2019s later claim that Grant created the strategy from nothing was no longer plausible.<\/p>\n
Grant may have exploited and expanded it.<\/p>\n
But the idea had existed in Lorraine before him.<\/p>\n
She had been searching for a way to preserve options.<\/p>\n
Legal access.<\/p>\n
Biological distinction.<\/p>\n
Financial control.<\/p>\n
Parental leverage.<\/p>\n
Different tools for different fears.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid my father know about these consultations?\u201d Travis asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe second one, yes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLorraine told me he had found the invoice.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
Another discovery through paperwork.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe canceled further work.\u201d<\/p>\n
Frank had intervened again.<\/p>\n
After the call, Travis remained silent.<\/p>\n
I waited.<\/p>\n
Finally he said, \u201cEvery time Dad found something, she stopped that version and started another.\u201d<\/p>\n
Caleb.<\/p>\n
Then Grant.<\/p>\n
Then Marlene.<\/p>\n
Then Daniel.<\/p>\n
Then trust objections.<\/p>\n
Then Christmas.<\/p>\n
Different methods.<\/p>\n
Same objective.<\/p>\n
\u201cMaybe she kept searching until someone told her what she wanted to hear,\u201d I said.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat sounds right.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grant\u2019s certainty had succeeded where Caleb\u2019s caution failed.<\/p>\n
That made Grant responsible for his own conduct.<\/p>\n
It did not erase Lorraine\u2019s persistence.<\/p>\n
We needed to hear that from her.<\/p>\n
Travis did not want another phone confrontation.<\/p>\n
Neither did I.<\/p>\n
So he wrote an email.<\/p>\n
Short.<\/p>\n
Calm.<\/p>\n
We learned about your consultations with Caleb Ross. We know he warned you not to use financial support to manufacture evidence of Daniel\u2019s involvement. We need you to stop attributing the entire strategy to Grant. If you want any chance of rebuilding trust with us, tell the truth about what came from you and what came from him.<\/p>\n
He sent it.<\/p>\n
Lorraine responded two hours later.<\/p>\n
You are right.<\/p>\n
Nothing else.<\/p>\n
Then, twenty minutes after that, a second email arrived.<\/p>\n
Longer.<\/p>\n
She admitted she had started thinking about legal boundaries before meeting Grant.<\/p>\n
She described the fear plainly.<\/p>\n
After Travis and I became engaged, Lorraine believed she was becoming optional.<\/p>\n
She saw weekends that had once belonged to extended family become soccer practice, errands, school functions, birthday parties, bedtime routines.<\/p>\n
She understood intellectually that this was normal.<\/p>\n
Emotionally, she experienced it as abandonment.<\/p>\n
That did not surprise us.<\/p>\n
What followed did.<\/p>\n
She wrote that Frank had never depended on the children emotionally the way she did.<\/p>\n
He had hobbies.<\/p>\n
Friends.<\/p>\n
Work.<\/p>\n
A large circle beyond family.<\/p>\n
Lorraine\u2019s identity had narrowed over decades.<\/p>\n
Mother.<\/p>\n
Wife.<\/p>\n
Grandmother.<\/p>\n
When Frank died, one of those roles vanished.<\/p>\n
Before his death, she had already felt another changing.<\/p>\n
Travis becoming a father meant she no longer occupied the same central place in his life.<\/p>\n
And because Zia entered through marriage instead of birth, Lorraine found a story that made the loss feel less like ordinary adulthood.<\/p>\n
It was not that her son had grown.<\/p>\n
It was that someone else\u2019s child had taken him.<\/p>\n
The sentence was ugly.<\/p>\n
Lorraine wrote it anyway.<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
She admitted she had gone to Caleb looking for reassurance that she could not simply be pushed away.<\/p>\n
When he told her relationship mattered more than legal leverage, she heard only the part she feared.<\/p>\n
No guaranteed rights.<\/p>\n
So she began looking for other forms of protection.<\/p>\n
Then Frank discovered the consultation.<\/p>\n
They fought.<\/p>\n
He told her she was turning affection into ownership.<\/p>\n
She hated him for saying it.<\/p>\n
Years later, she understood why.<\/p>\n
Travis read the email slowly.<\/p>\n
At one point he stopped and rubbed his eyes.<\/p>\n
Lorraine wrote that Grant did not invent her fear.<\/p>\n
He gave it a strategy.<\/p>\n
Marlene gave it organization.<\/p>\n
Daniel gave it a visible role.<\/p>\n
Money gave it momentum.<\/p>\n
But the fear was hers.<\/p>\n
So were the choices.<\/p>\n
No one forced her to write Guest.<\/p>\n
No one forced her to label a candle Travis\u2019s Girl.<\/p>\n
Those actions belonged entirely to her.<\/p>\n
She ended with:<\/p>\n
I am not asking you to excuse me because I was afraid. I am telling you because I finally understand that fear was the reason, not the justification.<\/p>\n
Travis sat with the message for a long time.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s the first thing she\u2019s written that Dad would believe.\u201d<\/p>\n
I understood what he meant.<\/p>\n
Frank\u2019s letters made clear distinctions.<\/p>\n
Explanation was not absolution.<\/p>\n
Love was not immunity.<\/p>\n
Fear did not excuse harm.<\/p>\n
Lorraine was finally using the same language.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you want to answer?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot yet.\u201d<\/p>\n
Good.<\/p>\n
Truth did not always need immediate reward.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, North Grove\u2019s lawsuit moved.<\/p>\n
Discovery requests began.<\/p>\n
Maya kept us informed only where our family or the trust was directly affected.<\/p>\n
One request sought communications between Lorraine and Grant discussing trust beneficiaries.<\/p>\n
Another sought records of payments to Marlene.<\/p>\n
Another targeted documents involving Daniel.<\/p>\n
Grant\u2019s attorneys fought almost all of it.<\/p>\n
Then a judge ordered limited production.<\/p>\n
That was when the first serious record appeared.<\/p>\n
A spreadsheet.<\/p>\n
Not Lorraine\u2019s.<\/p>\n
Grant\u2019s.<\/p>\n
The title was Bennett Relationship Matrix.<\/p>\n
I stared at the phrase.<\/p>\n
\u201cRelationship matrix?\u201d<\/p>\n
Maya sent the relevant excerpt.<\/p>\n
Columns listed family members.<\/p>\n
Status.<\/p>\n
Potential beneficiary.<\/p>\n
Influence.<\/p>\n
Risk.<\/p>\n
I felt physically ill.<\/p>\n
Aaron.<\/p>\n
Melissa.<\/p>\n
Their children.<\/p>\n
Travis.<\/p>\n
Zia.<\/p>\n
Daniel.<\/p>\n
Even me.<\/p>\n
Beside Zia\u2019s name were four words.<\/p>\n
Non-biological. Classification risk high.<\/p>\n
Beside Daniel:<\/p>\n
Useful biological counterweight.<\/p>\n
Travis stood so quickly his chair scraped backward.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
His voice was low.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
I understood.<\/p>\n
Seeing the strategy described clinically was worse than hearing Lorraine admit it emotionally.<\/p>\n
A child had been reduced to a risk category.<\/p>\n
A father reduced to a counterweight.<\/p>\n
The spreadsheet appeared to have been created by Grant\u2019s office.<\/p>\n
Marlene\u2019s initials appeared in comments.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Lorraine see this?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
Maya did not know yet.<\/p>\n
That question mattered.<\/p>\n
If she had, her responsibility deepened.<\/p>\n
If she had not, Grant and Marlene had been manipulating her fears more deliberately than we knew.<\/p>\n
Another column made Travis go still.<\/p>\n
Expected future value.<\/p>\n
Beside Zia\u2019s name was a projected range tied to Frank\u2019s trust and back-parcel appreciation.<\/p>\n
Grant had estimated the financial effect of her inclusion.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is why,\u201d Travis said.<\/p>\n
The numbers were not enormous individually.<\/p>\n
But they were enough to explain obsession in someone already terrified of losing control.<\/p>\n
Then we reached the final column.<\/p>\n
Recommended action.<\/p>\n
Beside Zia:<\/p>\n
Maintain ambiguity until estate issues mature.<\/p>\n
Four words.<\/p>\n
Maintain ambiguity.<\/p>\n
The entire family history reduced to a business tactic.<\/p>\n
Keep her close enough to use.<\/p>\n
Far enough to exclude.<\/p>\n
Loved enough to appear kind.<\/p>\n
Different enough to challenge.<\/p>\n
I looked at Travis.<\/p>\n
His face had gone white.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s exactly what Mom did.\u201d<\/p>\n
Yes.<\/p>\n
The terrible question was whether Lorraine had been following Grant\u2019s strategy knowingly.<\/p>\n
Maya said another batch of emails might answer that.<\/p>\n
Before those arrived, Daniel called.<\/p>\n
His scheduled call with Zia had ended ten minutes earlier.<\/p>\n
He sounded shaken.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you see the spreadsheet?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow do you know about it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMaya\u2019s office asked me about some dates.\u201d<\/p>\n
Right.<\/p>\n
His communications were part of the production.<\/p>\n
\u201cI saw part.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you know what they called me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cUseful biological counterweight.\u201d<\/p>\n
The bitterness in his voice was directed inward too.<\/p>\n
\u201cI let them.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou didn\u2019t know they called you that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI knew enough.\u201d<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
He continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cI want to stop taking Lorraine\u2019s money.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAre you still taking it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOne automatic transfer came last month.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFive hundred.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSend it back.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI already did.\u201d<\/p>\n
Good.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m also going to put in writing that I don\u2019t want any financial support from her related to Zia.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s smart.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd I\u2019m not contesting adoption.\u201d<\/p>\n
I froze.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel breathed slowly.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m not saying I\u2019m giving up my rights tomorrow.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOkay.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut if someday Zia wants Travis to adopt her, I\u2019m not going to fight just because Lorraine wants me to.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at Travis.<\/p>\n
He had heard.<\/p>\n
He did not celebrate.<\/p>\n
That was important.<\/p>\n
This was not a victory over Daniel.<\/p>\n
It was a shift in his understanding.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy are you telling us now?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause I finally saw what I was doing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLetting people pay me to stay exactly unreliable enough to matter.\u201d<\/p>\n
The sentence was brutal.<\/p>\n
Accurate.<\/p>\n
He continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t want to be useful anymore.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat do you want?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo either be her father in some real way or stop pretending I\u2019m protecting something by showing up when it benefits me.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was the most responsible thing Daniel had said in years.<\/p>\n
We agreed to continue slowly.<\/p>\n
Regular calls.<\/p>\n
A possible daytime visit with planning.<\/p>\n
No sudden promises.<\/p>\n
No money.<\/p>\n
No legal threats.<\/p>\n
After we hung up, Travis sat beside me.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat changes things.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you want me to adopt her?\u201d<\/p>\n
The question surprised me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou already know the answer.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI mean legally.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked toward the stairs.<\/p>\n
\u201cSomeday, maybe.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy not now?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause this cannot become a reaction to Lorraine.\u201d<\/p>\n
He nodded.<\/p>\n
Exactly.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf Zia wants it when she understands what it means.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd Daniel needs to decide what kind of relationship he actually intends to maintain.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Travis looked relieved.<\/p>\n
Not because adoption mattered less.<\/p>\n
Because he understood it could not be used as another weapon.<\/p>\n
Not against Lorraine.<\/p>\n
Not against Daniel.<\/p>\n
Not even in defense of Zia.<\/p>\n
The next morning, Maya sent another email.<\/p>\n
More North Grove records had arrived.<\/p>\n
One contained an attachment titled Proposed Family Positioning.<\/p>\n
Lorraine was copied.<\/p>\n
So was Marlene.<\/p>\n
Grant wrote:<\/p>\n
The key is consistency. Zia can be treated warmly without conceding equal beneficiary standing. Language matters.<\/p>\n
My stomach dropped.<\/p>\n
Language matters.<\/p>\n
Then the examples.<\/p>\n
Refer to her as Travis\u2019s child rather than granddaughter.<\/p>\n
Avoid statements implying permanent legal equivalence.<\/p>\n
Preserve Daniel\u2019s visible role.<\/p>\n
Document biological distinctions where appropriate.<\/p>\n
I stared at the screen.<\/p>\n
The candle tag.<\/p>\n
The place card.<\/p>\n
The refrigerator photograph.<\/p>\n
Years of tiny distinctions.<\/p>\n
Not all of them spontaneous.<\/p>\n
Some had been strategy.<\/p>\n
Travis whispered, \u201cShe knew.\u201d<\/p>\n
The evidence was finally there.<\/p>\n
Lorraine had not merely been influenced.<\/p>\n
She had received written guidance on how to keep Zia emotionally close while legally distinct.<\/p>\n
And instead of recoiling from it, she had followed it for years.<\/p>\n
Caleb Ross had not practiced law in our state for nearly three years. Maya located him through a professional directory and contacted him the following morning. He returned her call … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1465,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1483","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-drama-sory"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lastestdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1483","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lastestdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lastestdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastestdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastestdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1483"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lastestdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1483\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1518,"href":"https:\/\/lastestdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1483\/revisions\/1518"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastestdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1465"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lastestdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1483"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastestdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1483"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastestdrama.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1483"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}